Monday, June 6, 2005
Six Sigma
Presenter Jean-Marie Cote
He is a Master Black Belt working for PACCAR
Six Sigma – A strategic tool
Historical background
Developed at Motorola (1987)
.
.
.
GE (1985) – turning point
.
.
.
They have not all been successful. Implementation is the issue, not the programme.
Has many names:
Six Sigma – driving business excellence
Operations excellence
Lean manufacturing
Lean operations
Lean six sigma
TPS
High impact Kaisen
1. close understanding of customer needs and wants
2. design led use of facts, data and statistical analysis
3. diligent approach to problem solving
Six Sigma takes time. It is not a quick fix.
Definition
- statistical measure of performance
- rigorous analytic appr4oaqc for
o process variation reduction
o complex prpblem solving
o waste reduction
- a philosophy that higher quality results in
o increased efficiency
o business excellence
o enhanced customer satisfaction
It is NOT
- just statistics
- a rigid mechanical approach – it can be flexigle and can be adjusted
- not a panacea – not suited for all situations
- magic
need all the rigt people and must be top down (ie supported by all levels of management)
driving excellence
define – measure – analyze – improve/design – control/validate
project selection is key
- in line with business strategy
- target customers
- add value
MUST BE VERY WELL DEFINED
Baseline must be understood
Must be able to measure
Definable goals
Timeline
Reasonable boundaries
As project progresses you refine and redefine project]map the process and identify non value added activities (NVA)
Take time to accurately define the defect
Soft tools
Process map (IPO)
Cause and effect matrix (QFD)
- what and how
- what customer wants and how delivered
Cause and effect diagrams (Fishbone)
- what we think is driving the issue
Waste elimination
- value stream map
- process flow
- spaghetti diagram
Pareto and time charts
Input and output characteristics
Input and output characteristics must be characterized and weighted in relation to goal
Critical characteristics must be measures
# of characteristics must be manageable
Focus on the process not the people until y ou know the process is robust. After that training can be addressed.
Low hanging fruit
Non value added steops – get rid of them
All steps need to add value
There are some necessary NVA – legal, EH&S, etc.
Analyze phase
Use information to create knowledge
Draw conclusions
Objectives
find root cause not symptoms
propose options
options mean change. Change means impact on someone. Change may involve investment.
Up to this point you have control and responsibility. After this point someone else may be responsible.
Challenges
Foresee impact of changes
COMMUNICATE
Loop back regularly to revise process
SLA2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment